ProSolvr logo

Resolve problems, permanently

Root Cause Analysis of Landing Gear Failure

Landing Gear Failure Root Cause Analysis

Landing Gear Failure is one of the most critical safety events in aviation. When the landing gear system fails to deploy, retract, or lock correctly, the consequences can include hard landings, runway excursions, aircraft damage, and significant operational disruption. Beyond safety risks, such failures can trigger regulatory scrutiny, costly repairs, and loss of operational confidence.

Landing Gear Failure rarely results from a single fault. Mechanical issues such as Actuation Failure, worn actuators, or jammed mechanisms may combine with Structural Damage caused by corrosion or fatigue cracks. Hydraulic problems like fluid contamination, moisture ingress, debris in fluid, pressure loss, pump failure, or hydraulic leaks can reduce system responsiveness. Electrical failures including control system failure, sensor signal loss, faulty relays, power supply issues, blown circuit breakers, or wiring faults further complicate diagnosis. Maintenance gaps, improper inspections, inadequate design margins, and abnormal operating conditions such as overweight landings or hard landings often amplify the risk.

The real challenge begins after the incident. Fixing a damaged component does not eliminate the underlying weakness. Without structured Root Cause Analysis, organizations risk repeat Landing Gear Failure events, increased audit findings, and recurring downtime. Complex interactions between Mechanical, Hydraulic, Electrical, Maintenance, Design, and Operational factors require a disciplined, system level investigation approach.

ProSolvr enables structured, AI powered Root Cause Analysis using visual Fishbone diagrams aligned with Six Sigma principles. It helps teams clearly map cause and effect relationships, standardize investigations, strengthen CAPA documentation, and reduce recurrence risk. By turning complex Landing Gear Failure investigations into a clear and collaborative process, ProSolvr supports safer operations and stronger long term aviation reliability.

Landing Gear Failure

    • Mechanical
      • Actuation Failure
        • Worn actuators
        • Jammed mechanisms
      • Structural Damage
        • Corrosion
        • Fatigue cracks
    • Hydraulic
      • Fluid Contamination
        • Moisture ingress
        • Debris in fluid
      • Pressure Loss
        • Pump failure
        • Hydraulic leaks
    • Electrical
      • Control System Failure
        • Sensor signal loss
        • Faulty relays
      • Power Supply Issues
        • Blown circuit breakers
        • Wiring faults
    • Maintenance
      • Incorrect Repairs
        • Improper torqueing
        • Wrong part installation
      • Improper Inspection
        • Incomplete checklists
        • Missed defects
    • Design
      • Design Margins Inadequate
        • Material selection issues
        • Underestimated loads
      • Insufficient Redundancy
        • Lack of backup systems
        • Single-point failures
    • Operations
      • Procedural Non-compliance
        • Delayed gear extension
        • Checklist deviations
      • Abnormal Operating Conditions
        • Overweight landings
        • Hard landings

Suggested Actions Checklist

Here are some corrective actions, preventive actions and investigative actions that organizations may find useful:

    • Mechanical
      • Actuation Failure
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Replace or repair the failed actuation components and restore proper mechanical movement.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Implement periodic mechanical health checks to ensure actuators operate within specified limits.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Examine the actuation system to determine how mechanical resistance or failure contributed to the short circuit event.
      • Structural Damage
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Repair or replace damaged structural elements affecting component alignment or protection.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Strengthen structural inspection criteria to identify early signs of damage before electrical exposure occurs.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Assess whether structural degradation led to insulation breach or contact between electrical components.
    • Hydraulic
      • Fluid Contamination
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Flush the hydraulic system and replace contaminated fluid to prevent further damage.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Improve sealing and contamination control measures to avoid fluid interaction with electrical systems.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Analyze how contaminated fluid may have migrated and caused electrical shorting.
      • Pressure Loss
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Restore hydraulic pressure by repairing affected components and verifying system integrity.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Introduce routine pressure monitoring to detect abnormalities early.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Investigate whether pressure loss caused unintended component movement leading to electrical contact.
    • Electrical
      • Control System Failure
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Repair or replace faulty control system components and revalidate functionality.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Enhance control system robustness through improved component qualification and testing.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Trace control system failure paths to identify how loss of control contributed to the short circuit.
      • Power Supply Issues
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Isolate and correct the power supply fault to safely restore electrical power.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Implement protective devices and regular electrical integrity checks.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Determine whether power instability or distribution faults directly initiated the short circuit.
    • Maintenance
      • Incorrect Repairs
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Rectify improper repairs and reinstall components according to approved procedures.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Strengthen maintenance training and certification requirements.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Review maintenance records to assess how repair errors may have introduced short circuit risks.
      • Improper Inspection
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Conduct a comprehensive re-inspection to identify and correct missed issues.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Standardize inspection protocols with clear accountability.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Evaluate inspection effectiveness to determine how defects related to short circuits were overlooked.
    • Design
      • Design Margins Inadequate
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Update the design to increase safety margins for electrical and mechanical interfaces.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Apply conservative design margin standards in future designs.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Analyze whether inadequate margins allowed conditions conducive to a short circuit.
      • Insufficient Redundancy
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Introduce redundancy to eliminate single points of electrical failure.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Incorporate redundancy requirements into design reviews and approvals.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Assess how lack of redundancy amplified the impact of the short circuit event.
    • Operations
      • Procedural Non-compliance
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Reinforce adherence to operating procedures through immediate retraining.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Introduce procedural compliance audits and reinforcement mechanisms.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Review operational deviations to understand their role in triggering the short circuit.
      • Abnormal Operating Conditions
        • Corrective Actions:
          • Inspect and repair systems stressed during abnormal operations.
        • Preventive Actions:
          • Define operational limits clearly and monitor adherence.
        • Investigative Actions:
          • Examine whether abnormal operating conditions led to electrical overstress or insulation failure.
 

Who can learn from the Landing Gear Failure template?

  • Aircraft Maintenance Technicians and Engineers: They can understand how incorrect repairs, improper inspections, and missed defects contribute to landing gear failures, enabling improvements in maintenance quality, documentation accuracy, and regulatory compliance.
  • Aerospace Design Engineers: They can gain insights into issues such as inadequate design margins, insufficient redundancy, and material selection challenges, helping strengthen future landing gear designs and structural robustness.
  • Flight Operations and Pilots: Operational teams can recognize how procedural non-compliance, delayed gear extension, and abnormal operating conditions such as hard or overweight landings affect landing gear reliability and operational safety.
  • Quality Assurance and Safety Teams: Safety and QA professionals can use the RCA to uncover systemic weaknesses across mechanical, hydraulic, electrical, and maintenance domains, supporting effective corrective and preventive action initiatives.
  • Reliability and Systems Engineers: These teams can evaluate recurring failure modes such as actuation failures, hydraulic pressure loss, and control system malfunctions to enhance reliability engineering practices and failure prevention strategies.
  • Training and Compliance Teams: Training professionals can leverage RCA findings to address skill gaps, improve inspection standards, reinforce procedural adherence, and update training programs based on identified root causes.

Why use this template?

ProSolvr helps teams visualize how various factors contribute to landing gear failure. By clearly mapping these relationships, the platform supports structured discussions, consensus-building, and the development of robust CAPA plans. This ensures that corrective actions go beyond immediate fixes and drive long-term improvements in design practices, maintenance procedures, and operational discipline across the aerospace organization.

Use ProSolvr by smartQED to systematically root out problems in aerospace domain.

Curated from community experience and public sources:

  • https://skybrary.aero/articles/landing-gear-failure-oghfa-se
  • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785319339318